Monday, 13 February 2017

武吉兰樟:可耻的奢侈表现!





武吉兰樟:可耻的奢侈表现!

上述两个视频剪辑在电子社交媒体面子书和WhatsApp疯狂分享。

但视频显示,20人花费新币240,000的团圆晚餐收据可能不是真实的。晚餐确实进行中,显然花费被扩大。(详细内容请阅读Asiaone新闻。)

无论图像和视频剪辑是真实的还是只是一个假象,这牵涉生活中的道德问题。

一词 :奢侈

“你可能是超级富豪,并可以你想要的方式花掉你的财富。但是,有一个非常宝贵的美德 - “谦虚”民政党副议长赛阿都拉萨说。

他说今天你可能是超级富豪,但明天可能成为穷人。

“在炫耀你的财富之前,只要想想一下穷人和那些饥饿的人和那些在这个世界饿死的人。

“是的,你可尽情并谦虚性享受你的财富,同时善于推动慈善工作。”他补充说。

民政党第14届大选武吉兰樟州议席(N.37)协调人赛阿都拉萨说:富有的马来西亚人也表现出日益增长的“奢侈”或“炫耀”趋势。

“他们过于强调生活方式,言语或行动。这对社区和社会并没带来任何好处。”他补充说。

赛阿都拉萨说:“当然拥有正确思想的父母不想让他们的孩子在如此环境长大。他们希望孩子们能成熟地长大,诚实地努力积累财富。

“但是,作为人类,我们不应对美德和生命中的正面价值观妥協。

“你被骗了吗?视频显示‘240,000新币的团圆餐’原来是假的

"Were you fooled? Video showing '$240,000 reunion meal' turns out to be fake

Alert netizens were quick to flag out that the restaurant in the video was serving Taiwanese cuisine, while Feng Shui Inn serves Cantonese cuisine.
Photo: Facebook screengrabs

What does a $240,000 meal for 20 people look like? It seems many netizens are now aching to know.

A video which surfaced on social media purportedly shows a family feasting on the infamous $240,000 reunion meal at Feng Shui Inn restaurant at Resorts World Sentosa.

At first glance, the video has all the trappings of an opulent dinner that fits a $240,000 bill: A private room, a massive table, a wide lazy susan surrounding a huge steamer containing Chinese delicacies and seafood. And to make things more posh, waiters line up in rows to serve guests at the table while a dedicated restaurant staff can be heard describing the dishes through the sound system.

Explains the massive bill that came with the meal? Probably.

Except that the video is not related to Singapore's priciest meal - the latest of such deceptive news flooding the Facebook timelines of unsuspecting netizens, this time leeching on the buzz created by a photo of the $240,000 Feng Shui Inn receipt.


Alert netizens were quick to flag out that the restaurant in the video was serving Taiwanese cuisine, while Feng Shui Inn serves Cantonese cuisine. - asiaone"

N.37 LET BUKIT LANJAN SOAR WITH SYED ABDUL RAZAK ALSAGOFF

No comments:

Post a Comment